Category Overview

Standards — Election Security Glossary

279 election security terms in the Standards category, with definitions sourced from NIST, CISA, EAC, and 30+ authoritative documents.

Browse all 279 terms in Standards

Identifiertype

Used in request and response messages.

Medium consensus1 source

Image

Used in request and response messages.

Medium consensus1 source

Inactivity Timeout

A mechanism that locks, suspends, or logs off a user after a specified period of inactivity.

Medium consensus1 source

Independently

Without assistance from an election worker or other person.

Medium consensus1 source

Indirect Selection

The mechanism by which a selection for a specific contest option automatically selects other linked contest options.

Medium consensus1 source

Interaction Mode

Control or navigation option that enables voters to operate and interact with the voting system , used in conjunction with a display format.

Medium consensus1 source

Internet Service Provider (isp)

Organization that provides access to the Internet for customers or members.

Medium consensus1 source

Java Applet

A software application written in the Java programming language that is usually launched through a web page.

Medium consensus1 source

Latlng

Used in response messages. Location optionally includes this element to specify the latitude and longitude of a voter’s voting location.

Medium consensus1 source

Limited Dexterity Mode

An interaction mode with accessibility features for voters with no use of one or both hands or low dexterity.

Medium consensus1 source

Local Area Network (lan)

Also see MAN and WAN. A computer network that connects computer and other devices such as printers in a limited area such as a school, office building or home.

Medium consensus1 source

Locality

Generic term used in election contexts to signify a town , village or city contained within an election jurisdiction , such as a county.

Medium consensus1 source

By ESG Editorial Team · Drawing on NIST, IEEE, the EAC, and 25+ sources on election standards and best practices

Standards are the technical and procedural benchmarks that election systems and practices are measured against. They include the federal Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG), state-level certification criteria, professional and industry best practices, and the consensus documents published by standards organizations like NIST and IEEE.

Why this category matters for election security is that standards give the field a shared reference point. Without them, every jurisdiction would have to invent its own criteria, and there would be no way to compare systems, procedures, or outcomes across jurisdictions. With them, an election official in one county can look at a standard and know what is expected, and a federal agency can audit a state against a known baseline.

Standards are not law. They are voluntary until adopted. The VVSG, for example, only becomes binding when incorporated by reference into a state's certification process or a federal procurement rule. But the voluntary nature of standards is misleading. In practice, adherence to recognized standards is often treated as evidence of due diligence, and departures from them invite scrutiny.

The terminology in this category covers both the standards themselves and the bodies that create them. The concepts here describe a layered system: international standards, federal expectations, state requirements, and local procedures, all building on each other.

How These Terms Relate

These concepts together describe the standards ecosystem that supports election administration. The terminology covers both the standards themselves (VVSG, the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, IEEE standards) and the bodies that create them. The unifying theme is that standards provide a shared reference point: a way for a county, a state, and a federal agency to speak a common language about what good election security looks like.

Related categories

Can't find the right category?

Search the full glossary, or browse every term alphabetically instead.