Standards — Election Security Glossary
279 election security terms in the Standards category, with definitions sourced from NIST, CISA, EAC, and 30+ authoritative documents.
Browse all 279 terms in Standards
Data Accuracy
"Data accuracy is defined in terms of RATE.
Data Element
A basic unit of information that has a unique meaning and subcategories (data items) of distinct value.
Depth
An attribute associated with an assessment method that addresses the rigor and level of detail associated with the application of the method.
Design Entity
Component of a design, named and referenced uniquely, that is both structurally and functionally different from other elements.
Design Entity Attributes
Named characteristic or property of a design entity, which provides a statement of fact about the entity.
Designating Authority
Body established within government or empowered by government to designate conformity assessment bodies, suspend or withdraw their designation or remove their suspension from…
Direct Recording Electronic Voting Machine
A vote-capture device that allows: electronic presentation of a ballot , electronic selection of valid contest options , and electronic storage of contest selections as individual…
Direct Voter Associations
A voter’s personally identifiable information (PII) created or stored by the voting system that can be used to associate a voter with their ballot selections.
By ESG Editorial Team · Drawing on NIST, IEEE, the EAC, and 25+ sources on election standards and best practices
Standards are the technical and procedural benchmarks that election systems and practices are measured against. They include the federal Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG), state-level certification criteria, professional and industry best practices, and the consensus documents published by standards organizations like NIST and IEEE.
Why this category matters for election security is that standards give the field a shared reference point. Without them, every jurisdiction would have to invent its own criteria, and there would be no way to compare systems, procedures, or outcomes across jurisdictions. With them, an election official in one county can look at a standard and know what is expected, and a federal agency can audit a state against a known baseline.
Standards are not law. They are voluntary until adopted. The VVSG, for example, only becomes binding when incorporated by reference into a state's certification process or a federal procurement rule. But the voluntary nature of standards is misleading. In practice, adherence to recognized standards is often treated as evidence of due diligence, and departures from them invite scrutiny.
The terminology in this category covers both the standards themselves and the bodies that create them. The concepts here describe a layered system: international standards, federal expectations, state requirements, and local procedures, all building on each other.
How These Terms Relate
These concepts together describe the standards ecosystem that supports election administration. The terminology covers both the standards themselves (VVSG, the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, IEEE standards) and the bodies that create them. The unifying theme is that standards provide a shared reference point: a way for a county, a state, and a federal agency to speak a common language about what good election security looks like.
Related categories
50 terms
The process of testing systems against these standards.
Compliance5 terms
The practice of meeting these standards in routine operations.
Voting Systems1,792 terms
The systems that are certified against VVSG and other technical standards.
Auditing46 terms
The reviews that confirm ongoing adherence to standards.
Can't find the right category?
Search the full glossary, or browse every term alphabetically instead.