Category Overview

Standards — Election Security Glossary

279 election security terms in the Standards category, with definitions sourced from NIST, CISA, EAC, and 30+ authoritative documents.

Browse all 279 terms in Standards

Secure Hash Standard

The standard specifying hash algorithms that can be used to generate digests of messages.

Medium consensus2 sources

Security Categorization

The process of determining the security category for information or an information system.

Medium consensus2 sources

Security Content Automation Protocol (scap)

A suite of specifications that standardize the format and nomenclature by which software flaw and security configuration information is communicated, both to machines and humans.

Low consensus2 sources

Security Control Baseline

The set of minimum security controls defined for a low-impact, moderate- impact, or high-impact information system.

Medium consensus2 sources

Security Control Enhancements

Statements of security capability to 1) build in additional, but related, functionality to a basic control; and/or 2) increase the strength of a basic control.

Medium consensus2 sources

Security Range

Highest and lowest security levels that are permitted in or on an information system, system component, subsystem, or network.

Medium consensus2 sources

Security Requirements Baseline

Description of the minimum requirements necessary for an information system to maintain an acceptable level of risk.

Medium consensus2 sources

Security Target

An implementation-dependent statement of security needs for a specific identified target of evaluation (TOE).

Low consensus2 sources

Sensitivity

A measure of the importance assigned to information by its owner, for the purpose of denoting its need for protection.

Medium consensus2 sources

Strength Of Mechanism (som)

A scale for measuring the relative strength of a security mechanism.

Medium consensus2 sources

Suite A

A specific set of classified cryptographic algorithms used for the protection of some categories of restricted mission critical information.

Medium consensus2 sources

Suite B

A specific set of cryptographic algorithms suitable for protecting both classified and unclassified national security systems, classified national security information, and…

Medium consensus2 sources

By ESG Editorial Team · Drawing on NIST, IEEE, the EAC, and 25+ sources on election standards and best practices

Standards are the technical and procedural benchmarks that election systems and practices are measured against. They include the federal Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG), state-level certification criteria, professional and industry best practices, and the consensus documents published by standards organizations like NIST and IEEE.

Why this category matters for election security is that standards give the field a shared reference point. Without them, every jurisdiction would have to invent its own criteria, and there would be no way to compare systems, procedures, or outcomes across jurisdictions. With them, an election official in one county can look at a standard and know what is expected, and a federal agency can audit a state against a known baseline.

Standards are not law. They are voluntary until adopted. The VVSG, for example, only becomes binding when incorporated by reference into a state's certification process or a federal procurement rule. But the voluntary nature of standards is misleading. In practice, adherence to recognized standards is often treated as evidence of due diligence, and departures from them invite scrutiny.

The terminology in this category covers both the standards themselves and the bodies that create them. The concepts here describe a layered system: international standards, federal expectations, state requirements, and local procedures, all building on each other.

How These Terms Relate

These concepts together describe the standards ecosystem that supports election administration. The terminology covers both the standards themselves (VVSG, the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, IEEE standards) and the bodies that create them. The unifying theme is that standards provide a shared reference point: a way for a county, a state, and a federal agency to speak a common language about what good election security looks like.

Related categories

Can't find the right category?

Search the full glossary, or browse every term alphabetically instead.