Category Overview

Voting Systems — Election Security Glossary

1,792 election security terms in the Voting Systems category, with definitions sourced from NIST, CISA, EAC, and 30+ authoritative documents.

Browse all 1,792 terms in Voting Systems

Emergency Voting System Change

A "modification to correct a vital, but defective, part of a program or the program's executable image, as used in the voting system.

Medium consensus1 source

Emission Limit

An upper bound on the power than an is permitted to radiate, to avoid ELECTRONIC DEVICE interference with nearby devices.

Medium consensus1 source

Empb

EBM-MARKED PAPER BALLOT.

Medium consensus1 source

Empb Capable Optical Scanner

An "OPTICAL used to count EMPBs." VVSG.

Medium consensus1 source

Enclosure Port

A through which electromagnetic radiation and disturbance may pass.

Medium consensus1 source

Encoder

A device used by a to activate a with information POLL WORKER VOTER ACCESS CARD concerning the appropriate ballot style to be presented to the voter.

Medium consensus1 source

Encouraged

In the VVSG, "is encouraged" indicates "an optional recommended action." See also SHOULD.

Medium consensus1 source

Encryption File System

A feature of the Windows operating system that allows files to be stored in encrypted form for security purposes.

Medium consensus1 source

End Card

A "data processing card which instructs the computer that all ballots of a precinct have been counted." 31 Ky.

Medium consensus1 source

End To End

1. With reference to security, "supporting both and VOTER VERIFICATION ELECTION VERIFICATION." VVSG.

Medium consensus1 source

End To End Accessibility

The ability of a voting system to provide for all aspects of a SESSION.

Medium consensus1 source

Endorsed Candidate

1. A candidate having an ENDORSEMENT, i.e.

Medium consensus1 source

By ESG Editorial Team · Drawing on NIST, the EAC, VVSG, IEEE, and 30+ authoritative sources on voting system design and certification

Voting systems are the machines, software, and supporting infrastructure through which voters mark, cast, and have their ballots counted. The category includes optical scanners, ballot-marking devices, direct-recording electronic (DRE) systems, hand-marked paper ballots, and the back-end systems that aggregate results from precincts and report them to the public.

Why this category matters for election security is rooted in the trust voters place in the systems that record their intent. A voting system that loses votes, that miscounts, or that allows manipulation without detection undermines the legitimacy of the entire election. Conversely, a system that is well designed, well tested, and well understood by election officials produces results that withstand scrutiny even when contested. The work of building and maintaining that trustworthiness is continuous.

Federal testing and certification programs establish a baseline. The Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG), administered by the Election Assistance Commission, define the technical and security requirements a system must meet to be used in federal elections. State testing goes further in some cases, certifying specific configurations, requiring additional documentation, or limiting the use of particular system features. Once a system is in the field, the work of securing it continues through patch management, configuration control, and pre-election logic and accuracy testing.

The terminology in this category reflects the technical and procedural landscape that voting systems inhabit. The concepts here are not optional. Every term describes a system property that has been the subject of standards, recommendations, and in some cases federal law.

How These Terms Relate

These concepts together describe the technical core of how votes are cast and counted. A voting system is more than a single device. It is an integrated chain of hardware, software, and procedures that begins when a voter enters the booth and ends when results are reported. The terminology here covers that full chain. Optical scan, ballot-marking devices, DRE systems, and VVPAT each represent different points on a spectrum of automation and paper reliance. The choice between them is a policy decision shaped by jurisdiction, voter expectations, and the trade-offs between speed, accessibility, auditability, and security.

Related categories

Can't find the right category?

Search the full glossary, or browse every term alphabetically instead.