Category Overview

Voting Systems — Election Security Glossary

1,792 election security terms in the Voting Systems category, with definitions sourced from NIST, CISA, EAC, and 30+ authoritative documents.

Browse all 1,792 terms in Voting Systems

Elderly

"65 years of age or older." 42 U.S.C.

Medium consensus1 source

Election Assistance Commission Board Of Advisors

See BOARD OF ADVISORS.

Medium consensus1 source

Election Bailiff

The election official in charge of a precinct in Mississippi.

Medium consensus1 source

Election Board Officer

A "person appointed to assist in the conduct of an election." Nev.

Medium consensus1 source

Election Board Register

The "record of registered voters provided to election boards." Nev.

Medium consensus1 source

Election Canvassing Commission

The chief canvassing body in Florida, composed of the Governor, Secretary of State and Director of Elections.

Medium consensus1 source

Election Center

A non-profit organization created to "promote, preserve and improve democracy." Under HAVA, the Election Center has the right to appoint two members to the ADVISORS.

Medium consensus1 source

Election Closeout Record

An electronic record required to be produced when a election is closed out so equipment can be reset for a subsequent election.

Medium consensus1 source

Election Commissioner

A county official appointed in large Nebraska counties to supervise elections.

Medium consensus1 source

Election Contest Emergency

A situation requiring the holding of a ELECTION.

Medium consensus1 source

Election Counter

A feature of a that "maintains a running count of each [ELECTION SIGNATURE MODULE KEY] generated.

Medium consensus1 source

Election Data Exchange

An open standard, consistent with IEEE 1622, for communicating election data, XML developed by Hart InterCivic.

Medium consensus1 source

By ESG Editorial Team · Drawing on NIST, the EAC, VVSG, IEEE, and 30+ authoritative sources on voting system design and certification

Voting systems are the machines, software, and supporting infrastructure through which voters mark, cast, and have their ballots counted. The category includes optical scanners, ballot-marking devices, direct-recording electronic (DRE) systems, hand-marked paper ballots, and the back-end systems that aggregate results from precincts and report them to the public.

Why this category matters for election security is rooted in the trust voters place in the systems that record their intent. A voting system that loses votes, that miscounts, or that allows manipulation without detection undermines the legitimacy of the entire election. Conversely, a system that is well designed, well tested, and well understood by election officials produces results that withstand scrutiny even when contested. The work of building and maintaining that trustworthiness is continuous.

Federal testing and certification programs establish a baseline. The Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG), administered by the Election Assistance Commission, define the technical and security requirements a system must meet to be used in federal elections. State testing goes further in some cases, certifying specific configurations, requiring additional documentation, or limiting the use of particular system features. Once a system is in the field, the work of securing it continues through patch management, configuration control, and pre-election logic and accuracy testing.

The terminology in this category reflects the technical and procedural landscape that voting systems inhabit. The concepts here are not optional. Every term describes a system property that has been the subject of standards, recommendations, and in some cases federal law.

How These Terms Relate

These concepts together describe the technical core of how votes are cast and counted. A voting system is more than a single device. It is an integrated chain of hardware, software, and procedures that begins when a voter enters the booth and ends when results are reported. The terminology here covers that full chain. Optical scan, ballot-marking devices, DRE systems, and VVPAT each represent different points on a spectrum of automation and paper reliance. The choice between them is a policy decision shaped by jurisdiction, voter expectations, and the trade-offs between speed, accessibility, auditability, and security.

Related categories

Can't find the right category?

Search the full glossary, or browse every term alphabetically instead.