Standards — Election Security Glossary
279 election security terms in the Standards category, with definitions sourced from NIST, CISA, EAC, and 30+ authoritative documents.
Browse all 279 terms in Standards
Test Case Specification
Document identifying the specific inputs and expected result for each test identified in the test plan.
Test Design Specification
Expanded detail of the test approach identified in the test plan for the related tests.
Traceability
Ability to relate a property of the result of a measurement or the value of a standard to stated references.
Type Font
Type of a given size and style, e.g., 10-point Bodoni Modern.
Uncertainty
Parameter, associated with the result of a measurement that characterizes the dispersion of the values that could reasonably be attributed to that which is being measures.
Uninterruptable Power Supply
A battery powered back-up system that quickly switches to battery power when electrical current to the computer system is disrupted (surge, sags, and failures).
Uocava Voter
An overseas voter or an active duty member of the U.S.
Up Load
Transfer data from a smaller computer or device to a larger computer.
User Serviceable Failure
Functional failure that can be remedied by a troubleshooter or election official using only knowledge found in voting equipment user documentation.
Verification And Validation (v&v)
The "process of determining whether requirement s for a system or component are complete and correct, the products of each development phase fulfill the requirements or conditions…
Voterclassification
Used in request and response messages.
Voterclassificationtype
Used in request and response messages.
By ESG Editorial Team · Drawing on NIST, IEEE, the EAC, and 25+ sources on election standards and best practices
Standards are the technical and procedural benchmarks that election systems and practices are measured against. They include the federal Voluntary Voting System Guidelines (VVSG), state-level certification criteria, professional and industry best practices, and the consensus documents published by standards organizations like NIST and IEEE.
Why this category matters for election security is that standards give the field a shared reference point. Without them, every jurisdiction would have to invent its own criteria, and there would be no way to compare systems, procedures, or outcomes across jurisdictions. With them, an election official in one county can look at a standard and know what is expected, and a federal agency can audit a state against a known baseline.
Standards are not law. They are voluntary until adopted. The VVSG, for example, only becomes binding when incorporated by reference into a state's certification process or a federal procurement rule. But the voluntary nature of standards is misleading. In practice, adherence to recognized standards is often treated as evidence of due diligence, and departures from them invite scrutiny.
The terminology in this category covers both the standards themselves and the bodies that create them. The concepts here describe a layered system: international standards, federal expectations, state requirements, and local procedures, all building on each other.
How These Terms Relate
These concepts together describe the standards ecosystem that supports election administration. The terminology covers both the standards themselves (VVSG, the NIST Cybersecurity Framework, IEEE standards) and the bodies that create them. The unifying theme is that standards provide a shared reference point: a way for a county, a state, and a federal agency to speak a common language about what good election security looks like.
Related categories
50 terms
The process of testing systems against these standards.
Compliance5 terms
The practice of meeting these standards in routine operations.
Voting Systems1,792 terms
The systems that are certified against VVSG and other technical standards.
Auditing46 terms
The reviews that confirm ongoing adherence to standards.
Can't find the right category?
Search the full glossary, or browse every term alphabetically instead.