Results & Reporting — Election Security Glossary
3 election security terms in the Results & Reporting category, with definitions sourced from NIST, CISA, EAC, and 30+ authoritative documents.
By ESG Editorial Team · Drawing on NIST, EAC, state canvassing procedures, and 25+ authoritative sources on election reporting
Results and reporting covers the chain of activities that transforms tallies from individual precincts into the official outcomes that the public sees. The chain includes precinct-level tabulation, jurisdiction-level aggregation, transmission of results to centralized systems, canvassing by election boards, and publication in formats that voters, candidates, and journalists can use.
Why this category matters for election security is straightforward. A result that cannot be communicated clearly, audited effectively, or trusted by the public is, in practical terms, no better than no result at all. Election officials have a duty not only to count accurately but to show their work. The reporting process is the public interface of that duty.
Transmission of results from precincts to central systems is one of the most security-sensitive moments in the election cycle. It is also one of the most operationally constrained. Results must be transmitted quickly so that canvassing and certification proceed on schedule, but they must be transmitted with authentication, integrity protection, and audit logging so that no actor can alter reported results without detection. Balancing these requirements is a real engineering and procedural challenge.
The terminology in this category reflects both the mechanics of transmission and the procedural steps that turn raw precinct returns into certified outcomes. Each concept here is a place where trust is either earned or lost.
How These Terms Relate
These concepts together describe the journey from a voter's marked ballot to the public's view of the outcome. The terminology distinguishes between the raw counts transmitted on election night, the unofficial tallies reported by media and election offices, the official canvass where results are verified, and the certification that makes results binding. Each step is a different kind of claim with different levels of authority, and understanding the differences between them is essential for interpreting election outcomes responsibly.
Related categories
65 terms
The counting and aggregation that produce the underlying numbers.
Certification50 terms
The standards and approvals that systems must pass before they can be used.
Auditing46 terms
Independent reviews that confirm reported results are correct.
Communications53 terms
The public-facing messaging that accompanies result publication.
Can't find the right category?
Search the full glossary, or browse every term alphabetically instead.