Category Overview

Auditing — Election Security Glossary

46 election security terms in the Auditing category, with definitions sourced from NIST, CISA, EAC, and 30+ authoritative documents.

Browse all 46 terms in Auditing

Records

The recordings (automated and/or manual) of evidence of activities performed or results achieved (e.g., forms, reports, test results), which serve as a basis for verifying that…

Medium consensus3 sources

Recount

An additional count of the votes cast in an election, typically required due to state law, a candidate request, or a court order, that is used to determine the accuracy of the…

Low consensus3 sources

Risk Limiting Audit (rla)

Risk-limiting audits provide statistical assurance that election outcomes are correct by manually examin- ing portions of paper ballots or voter-verifiable paper records.

High consensus3 sources

Random Audit

An of voting machines selected at random.

Low consensus2 sources

Risk Limit

The largest statistical probability that, if an outcome is wrong, the RLA does not correct that outcome.

High consensus2 sources

Risk Limiting Audits (rlas)

A risk-limiting audit is a type of post-election audit, during which a random sample of ballots is selected and the selections on the ballots are compared to the electronic "cast…

High consensus2 sources

Risk Limiting Tabulation Audit

Post-election tabulation audit procedure for checking a sample of ballots (or voter verifiable records) that provides a pre-specified statistical chance of correcting the reported…

Medium consensus2 sources

Random Seed

A set of numbers generated by numerous people, including members of the public, rolling a ten-sided dice to generate the random sequence of ballots to be audited in a…

Medium consensus1 source

By ESG Editorial Team · Drawing on NIST, EAC, and 25+ sources on election auditing

Auditing is the practice of independently reviewing election processes and outcomes. The category covers pre-election logic and accuracy testing of voting equipment, post-election risk-limiting audits, performance audits of election offices, compliance audits against federal and state requirements, and financial audits of election administration spending.

Why this category matters for election security is that audits are how election offices demonstrate that they did what they said they did. A jurisdiction can have the most secure procedures in the world, but without independent verification, the public has only the word of the officials. Audits convert that claim into evidence.

The most visible form of election audit in recent years is the risk-limiting audit (RLA), a statistical procedure that compares reported results against a hand count of a random sample of ballots. RLAs are now required or recommended in a growing number of states. They provide a quantitative check on whether the reported outcome is consistent with the underlying ballots, with a controllable probability of confirming an incorrect result.

The terminology in this category covers both the specific audit procedures and the broader discipline of independent review. The concepts here are procedural. They describe how an audit is designed, conducted, and reported.

How These Terms Relate

These concepts together describe the discipline of election auditing. The terminology covers the full range of audit types: pre-election testing, post-election statistical audits, recounts, and compliance audits. The unifying theme is independence. An audit is valuable to the extent that the people conducting it are free to find and report problems. The election-specific application of that principle is the work of designing audit procedures that can confirm or refute the correctness of election outcomes within the time available.

Related categories

Can't find the right category?

Search the full glossary, or browse every term alphabetically instead.